Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Rwaikamba & Rwaithia Trading Company & 1 other v Town Clerk & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI JUDICIAL REVIEW DIVISION JR ELC MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 65 OF 2010 RWAIKAMBA & RWAITHIA TRADING COMPANY ……….APPLICANT VERSUS TOWN CLERK .………………………………………………...RESPONDENT CITY COUNCIL OF NAIROBI RULING When this matter came before me for further directions on 19th October, 2011 counsel for the Applicant asked me to allow the application as prayed in that although the Respondent had appointed an advocate no papers had been filed by the said advocate. Counsel for the Applicant also hinted that the matter may have been compromised and that is why the Respondent has not shown any interest. I have now perused the court file and find that the Applicant wants the Respondent stopped from collecting rent for certain houses. If indeed the matter has been settled by consent then the Applicant can withdraw these proceedings. In my view, this case needs to be addressed through a Judgment and not by just allowing the application as prayed. I will therefore give directions as follows:1. That the Applicant be at liberty to withdraw the proceedings. 2. If the Applicant does not wish to withdraw these proceedings then I direct that the Applicant takes a date for highlighting of its submissions and notify the Respondent of such a date. Dated, signed and delivered at Nairobi this 10th day of November, 2011 W. K. KORIR JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.