Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Elisha Mbuya Ooro v Josephine Achieng Mboya

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KITALE CIVIL CASE 66 OF 2011 ELISHA MBUYA OORO ) MILKA OGEMBO MBOYA).......................................APPLICANTS/PLAINTIFFS. AND JOSEPHINE ACHIENG MBOYA..............................RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT. RULING This application sought orders:i) That service of this application be dispensed with ex-parte in the first instance. ii) That this Honourable Court be pleased to issue an order of inhibition against Parcel No. TransNzoia/Kipsoen/451 to inhibit all dealings with the said parcel of land pending the hearing and determination of this suit. iii) That costs be provided for. This is the application dated the 27/07/2011 seeking Inter alia for an order of inhibition against Parcel No. Trans-Nzoia/Kipsoen/451 till the determination of the suit. The application was opposed. That the Respondent is the other wife of the deceased. That this is the land that her family resides on. Having considered the arguments by both parties the Court makes the following orders; that the land should not be alienated in any way and therefore issue an order of inhibition against Parcel No. Land No. Trans-Nzoia/Kipsoen/451. In the interest of justice under Section 63 (e) the Respondent to continue occupying the said piece of land. This matter must be set down for hearing within the next 90 days so that it is determined once and for all. The costs of the application will be in the cause.

page 1 of 2

SIGNED S. M. MUKETI JUDGE Read, dated and signed in the Open Court this 20th day of December, 2011. SIGNED S. M. MUKETI JUDGE Mr. Wanjala for the Respondent Mrs. Munialo for Wanyama. SIGNED S. M. MUKETI JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.