Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

John Kahwi Kabucho v Zakary Muriri Muraya & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU Civil Appeal 4 of 2009 JOHN KAHWI KABUCHO……..…………...……APPELLANT VERSUS ZAKARY MURIRI MURAYA…..………….1ST RESPONDENT GRACE WANJIRU MURIRI………..……..2ND RESPONDENT RULING The appellant is the plaintiff in Nyahururu PMCC No. 176 of 2008. His application for a temporary injunction to restrain the respondents who are the defendants in that case from continuing with construction on the disputed piece of land being Unsurveyed Plot No.A Nyahururu Municipality (the suit piece of land) was dismissed provoking this appeal. Pending the hearing and determination of the appeal he has made a similar application to this court. His case is that he was allocated the suit piece of land by the Commissioner of Lands on 27 th July 1999. In 2008 he found the respondents building on it and moved to court to restrain them but his application for injunction was dismissed. The respondents’ version of the story is that the suit piece of land was sold to them by the Municipal Council of Nyahururu on 21st June 1999. This appears to be a case of double allocation. The appellant has exhibited a letter of allotment from the Commissioner of Lands allocating the suit piece of land to him. The respondents have also exhibited a copy of the agreement between them and the Municipal Council of Nyahururu showing that the suit piece of land was sold to them by the Council. The main issue in the case therefore is which authority owned the suit piece of land before allocation; was it the Government or the Municipal Council of Nyahururu? If the respondents are allowed to continue with their construction on the suit piece of land and the issue is eventually determined in favour of the appellant that would deprive him of the suit piece of land. In the circumstances justice demands that the status quo be maintained until this appeal is heard and determined. Consequently I allow this

page 1 of 2

application and order that pending the hearing and determination of this appeal both parties are hereby restrained from occupying, carrying on or continuing with any construction on the suit piece of land. The costs of this application shall abide the outcome of the appeal. DATED and delivered this 28th day of January 2010. D. K. MARAGA JUDGE.

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.