Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Erasto Okudo Okoth: v Republic:

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET Criminal Appeal 70 of 2008 (From the original conviction and sentence in CM. Criminal case No.1710 of 2008 by the Principal Magistrate Mr. Njagi) ERASTO OKUDO OKOTH:…………………..…APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC:……………………………….……..RESPONDENT JUDGMENT The Appellant herein was charged and convicted on his own plea of guilty in eleven (11) counts of breaking and stealing from a shop. He was sentenced to various terms of imprisonment totaling to 55 years. He appealed praying that the sentence be reduced. The State concedes the Appeal. A perusal of the judgment clearly shows that the sentences were to run concurrently. That would not lead the Appellant to serve 55 years in prison. Those that computed the term as the Appellant was committed to prison made an error. The conviction stands. Sentences running concurrently would leave the Appellant serving 5 years in prison. I consequently order that he will serve a term of imprisonment of 5 years from the date of conviction and judgment, which is to say from 9th September 2008. Appeal succeeds. Orders accordingly. DATED AND DELIVERED AT ELDORET THIS 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2010. P.M.MWILU JUDGE IN THE PRESENCE OF:Paul Ekitela - Court clerk Present - Appellant Kabaka - State counsel

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.