REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KITALE Miscellaneous Application 85 of 2009 IN THE MATTER OF THE MENTAL HEALTH ACT IN THE MATTER OF E.M.M ALLEGED TO BE OF UNSOUND MIND AND E.M.M…2...............................................................APPLICANT RULING By a petition dated 25th November, 2009, the petitioner, E. M.M 2 seeks orders that he be appointed as guardian of the said E.M.M’s person and/or managing his property. The ground on which the petition is based is that E.M.M is a person of unsound mind within the meaning of the Mental Health Act. In addition he is a middle aged man of 54 years and suffers from neurological complications leading to right hemiplegia for the last two (2) years and as a consequence thereof became of unsound mind since April 2009. The application is supported by the annexed affidavit of E. M.M 2 sworn on the 25 th day of November 2009. The thrust of the applicant’s case is that E.M.M requires funds for treatment. The problem is compounded by the fact that he cannot speak, write or sign documents to facilitate the withdrawal of the requisite funds. I have considered the application and most importantly the disclosure that E.M.M has seven (7) relatives who are resident in Kenya (See paragraph 7 of the petition). In view of the disclosure, I give the applicant leave to file a consent of the seven (7) relatives before making further orders. In addition to filing the consent of the said relatives as aforesaid, the court would like to see all the relatives to confirm if the applicant’s application is well founded. Mention on the 15th day of March, 2010 to confirm if the consent has been filed so that a further hearing date can be fixed. Dated and delivered at Kitale this 2ND day of FEBRUARY 2010. N.R.O. OMBIJA JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.