Caselaw

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS) Civil Case 36 of 2008 RISPAR KERUBO ONSARE & ANOTHER ……………. PLAINTIFFS VERSUS CREDIT BANK LIMITED ………………………………. DEFENDANT RULING By this application, the plaintiffs seek an order that time within which to file an amended plant by the plaintiffs be enlarged or extended and the plaintiffs be allowed to file their amended plaint out of time. The application is brought by a Notice of Motion under Sections 3, 3A and 95 of the Civil Procedure Act, and Order XLIX Rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The reasons given for the delay in making the application are that the applicants were served by the defendant just before the commencement of the Christmas Vacation, and reopened on 11 th January, 2010. After the reopening, Counsel for the plaintiffs fell sick, thereby making it difficult for them to file the amended defence on time. The respondent has not filed any replying affidavit or grounds of opposition. At the hearing, Mr. Ashitiva for the respondents told the court that basically, he was not opposed to the application. However, he had written a letter applying for judgment, but the judgment had not yet been entered. Since it has not yet been entered, it would not be fair to deny the applicants a chance to prosecute their own application which has been set down for hearing. On account of the foregoing, and seeing that the application for extension for time to file the amended plaint out of time is not opposed, order 1 of the application by Notice of Motion dated 3rd February, 2010 is hereby granted as prayed. Costs in the cause. DATED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 15th day of April, 2010. L. NJAGI JUDGE