Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Harrison Maina Kariuki & 2 others v Jane Waithera Mungai & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU Civil Appeal 77 of 2000 HARRISON MAINA KARIUKI........................................1ST APPELLANT JOHN KIMANI KARIUKI................................................2 ND APPELLANT ISAAC NGANGA KARIUKI............................................3RD APPELLANT VERSUS JANE WAITHERA MUNGAI......................................1ST RESPONDENT MUNGAI MUTEMBEI.................................................2 ND RESPONDENT JUDGMENT On 30th October 2009 this court (Justice Mugo), upon the respondent’s application, dismissed this appeal for want of prosecution. Aggrieved by that ruling the 1st appellant filed a notice of appeal on 23rd November 2009 and applied for a copy of the proceedings to enable the appellants file a record of appeal. As that was after the 14 days period allowed for appeals to the Court of Appeal, they have now applied for enlargement of time to deem the said notice of appeal as having being filed timeously. The application is based on the ground that the ruling was delivered in the absence of the appellants and without notice to them and that by the time they knew of it the time for filing the notice of appeal had already expired. Mr. Ombati for the respondents strongly opposed the application arguing that the same is intended to perpetuate the injunction order which the appellants are enjoying. Section 7 of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act read together with Rule 41 of the Court of Appeal Rules gives this court jurisdiction to extend time for the filing of the notice of appeal. However, where the applicant has already filed a notice of appeal, the matter is taken out of the jurisdiction of this court. In such a case the applicant has to make his application for enlargement of time to the Court of Appeal – Trimborn Agricultural Engineering Ltd Vs David Njoroge Kabaiko & Another, Civil Apl. No. 274 of 1998. The applicants having filed a notice of appeal out of time this court has no jurisdiction to entertain this application. They therefore have to apply to the Court of Appeal. Their application in this court is in the circumstances incompetent and is accordingly struck out with costs to the respondents. DATED and DELIVERED at Nakuru this 25th day of May, 2010. D. K. MARAGA JUDGE.

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.