Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Juma Hassan Tumbo v Republic & 1 other

(From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No. 664 of Magistrate’s Court at Kwale: D.M. Ochenja - S.R.M.) 2006 of the Senior Resident JUMA HASSAN TUMBO ....................... APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC ........................................... RESPONDENT JUDGEMENT The Appellant herein JUMA HASSAN TUMBO, has filed his appeal against his conviction and sentence by the learned Senior Resident Magistrate sitting at Kwale Law Courts. The Appellant had been charged with the offence of DEFILEMENT OF A GIRL CONTRARY TO SECTION 145(1) OF THE PENAL CODE. He pleaded ‘not guilty’ to the offence and his trial commenced on 26 th May 2006. The prosecution called a total of four (4) witnesses in support of their case. At the end of the trial the learned trial magistrate convicted the Appellant and sentenced him to serve twenty (20) years in prison. I have perused the written submissions filed by the Appellant. I have also considered the oral submissions made by MR. MUTETI, learned State Counsel opposing this appeal. I have looked at the charge sheet and I note that the particulars failed to include the term “unlawful” before the words “carnal knowledge”. Mr. Muteti submitted that this omission was not fatal to the prosecution case. However I do disagree. In the case of NGENO –VS- REPUBLIC [2002] 1 KLR 457 the Court of Appeal held “A charge under S. 145(1) of the Penal Code must in its particulars include the word ‘unlawful’. Failure to state in the particulars that the carnal knowledge was unlawful renders the charge fatally defective” The Appellant was charged under S. 145(1) of the Penal Code. As such it was imperative that the word ‘unlawful’ be included in the charge sheet. The omission to include this word renders this charge fatally defective – a defect which is not curable under S. 382 of the Criminal Procedure Code. As such the conviction of the Appellant on the basis of this defective charge sheet is null and void. For this reason alone this appeal succeeds. The Appellant’s conviction is hereby quashed and his twenty (20) year sentence is set aside. The Appellant to be set at liberty forthwith unless he is otherwise lawfully held. Dated and Delivered in Mombasa this 22nd day of July 2010. M. ODERO JUDGE Read in open court in the presence of:Mr. Onserio for State Appellant in person

page 1 of 2

M. ODERO JUDGE 22/07/2010

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.