Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Kimathi Stephen v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU Criminal Appeal 252 of 2009 KIMATHI STEPHEN ......................................... APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC ...................................................... RESPONDENT RULING The appellant in this matter was charged before the lower court with the offence of defilement contrary to section 8 (2) of the Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006. After being tried, he was convicted and on 30th November 2009 was sentenced to serve life imprisonment. Being dissatisfied with the conviction and sentence, he filed the present appeal. Before the appeal was fixed for hearing, the appellant, through his counsel, filed a Chamber Summons dated 17th February 2010. By that application, he sought bail pending appeal. When the application came up for hearing, counsel for the appellant informed the court that the appellant was 17 years old and therefore a minor. The court on 18th March 2010 made an order for the appellant to be age assessed. By a report dated 17th May 2010, the Meru District Hospital assessed the approximate age of the appellant to be 17 years old. As a consequence of that assessment, the court on 20th July 2010 made an order that the appellant be placed at a juvenile home. The parties, that is, the appellant and the respondent were ordered to file written submissions in respect of the appeal. The intention of the court was to fast track the case in view of the alleged age of the appellant. However, when I sat down to consider this appeal, I realized that in all occasions when this appeal has been before me, that is from 19 th February 2010 up to 26th July 2010, the appellant has never appeared before court. I therefore cannot say whether in my estimation that the appellant is indeed 17 years old. It is for that reason that I decline to write the judgment in this appeal and opt for the appellant to be produced before court for the purposes of my satisfaction that indeed he is 17 years old. What is very striking is that the appellant in his affidavit in support of his application for bail pending appeal deponed thus:- “That I am young man but married to a house wife and I have two young children who heavily depend on me on their survivor.” That deposition cannot be attributed to a minor who is 17 years old. For that reason, I order the appellant, Elias Kimathi Stephen to be produced before court on 14th October 2010. On that date, another date for judgment will be given. Dated and delivered at Meru this 8th October 2010. MARY KASANGO JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.