Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Mohamed Riaz Butt v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI Criminal Appeal 676 of 2007 MOHAMED RIAZ BUTT ……………………………………………………….APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC…………………………………………………………………………..RESPONDENT JUDGMENT This appeal was filed by the Appellant himself. Mr. Gathenji for Appellant argued that the Appellant was charged with the offence of trafficking Narcotic Drugs contrary to Section 4 (a) of Act 4 of 1994. He was convicted and sentenced to 5 years imprisonment and 1 extra year in default 100,000/= fine. He was found at Jomo Kenyatta International Airport trafficking 37.2. grams of drug Diacetylmorphine commonly known as Heroine market value Shs. 37,200/=. The appellant submits that conviction was not proper. There was contradiction evidence. The judgment did not meet standard required. The Magistrate did not resolve the contradictions or give reasons refer to the case of Okali Okoth. The Magistrate did not comply with Section 169 Criminal Procedure Code. The accused was convicted on circumstantial evidence and there was no connection with drugs. Miss Maina State Counsel in reply said the State concedes the appeal on the grounds that the prosecution case has created doubts which ought to have been resolved in favour of the Appellant. The State having conceded the appeal I therefore quash the conviction and set aside sentence. I observe that much time has passed and there has been rethinking of the case. I order the Appellant to be set free forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 1st day of October 2010. J. N. KHAMINWA

page 1 of 2

JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.