REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Environmental & Land Case 464, 2087 of 2007,2001 GEORGE RUMBO(Deceased) ……..PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT VERSUS JONES GIBSON MWANGI ………....…DEFENDANT/APPLICANT RULING The Defendant is asking that the court dismisses the present suit for want of prosecution and to reconsider his application dated 9th October, 2008 and grant the prayers therein. The Plaintiff against whom the application is being brought passed away on 11th November, 2006. The history of this case is that on 3rd December, 2001 the Plaintiff came to court by way of originating summons under Order 36 rules 3, 3F and 5 of the Civil Procedure Rules seeking vacant possession of land number Nairobi/Block 76/810 which he had bought at a public auction and which the Defendant was interfering with. On 4th June, 2002 on basis that the Defendant had been served by advertisement in the DAILY NATION and had not entered appearance or filed defence, an ex parte judgment was entered. Execution duly followed. There have been various applications since, but the judgment and the consequential orders have not been set aside. The Plaintiff had this judgment in his favour when he died. The present application is incompetent as it purports to be against a dead Plaintiff. Under Order 23 rule 3(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules such application can only be brought against the legal representative of the deceased Plaintiff. Whatever other proceedings the Defendant is contemplating in this matter can only be brought against such a legal representative. For the time being, the present application is struck out. DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2010 A. O. MUCHELULE JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.