Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Land and Environmental Law Division v Peter Kihiuhi Njuguna

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI LAND AND ENVIRONMENTAL LAW DIVISION CIVIL SUIT (ELC) NO.596 OF 2009 JOHN IHUGO MUNGAI………………………………...PLAINTIFF VERSUS PETER KIHIUHI NJUGUNA……...………………….DEFENDANT RULING 1. Peter Kihuhi Njuguna who is the defendant in this suit has come to this court under Section 133(1) of the Land Registered Act seeking to have the caution lodged by the plaintiff against the suit property known as Kiambu/Munyu/222 removed. It is evident that the caution was lodged by the plaintiff with the Land Registrar on 5th May, 2010, and that the Land Registrar accepted the caution on the basis of the fact that the consent suit was pending. Subsequently, an application for an interlocutory injunction lodged by the plaintiff was rejected by this court. 2. I find that the caution which is still registered against the suit property is inconsistent with the order made by this court rejecting the application for interlocutory injunction. To have the caution remain registered against the suit property would have the effect of restraining the plaintiff from dealing with the suit property during the pendency of this suit, a matter which the court has in its ruling dated 1st March, 2010, found to be unmerited. 3. In the circumstances, I allow the defendant’s application dated 25th June, 2010 and order that the caution lodged by the plaintiff and registered against the suit property be removed. Plaintiff shall pay costs of this application to the defendant. Orders accordingly. Dated and delivered H. JUDGE In the Mwaura Advocate for B. Kosgei - Court clerk this 12th day of November, M. OKWENGU presence for of: the the 2010 defendant/applicant plaintiff/respondent absent

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.