REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERICHO CRIMINAL CASE NO. 13 OF 2009 REPUBLIC ………………………………................................................................................. ……………. PROSECUTOR VERSUS HASSAN WAFULA …………………………............................................................................ ………...........1ST ACCUSED JAMES NGIRINE ………………….............................................................................. ………………………..2ND ACCUSED ARON MUTWIWA …………………............................................................................. ………………………3RD ACCUSED ROBERT MUTISO …………………............................................................................. ……………………….4TH ACCUSED RULING Pursuant to section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code, Chapter 75 of the Laws of Kenya, I have carefully considered the evidence adduced in this case, and I have come to the conclusion that the accused have a case to answer. I therefore put them on their defence. Each one of them is at liberty to give sworn or unsworn testimony or to remain mum or silent and to call witnesses. Cross-examination shall ensue where sworn evidence is given. Defence Counsel shall indicate to the court the line of defence their clients intend to take. DATED at KERICHO this 26th day of October, 2010 G.B.M. KARIUKI,sc RESIDENT JUDGE COUNSEL APPEARING Mr. P. Kiprop State Counsel for the Republic Mr. E.M. Orina advocate for the 3rd and 4th Accused. Mr. T.M.O. Nyaingiri advocate for the 1st Accused Mr. Meroka for the 2nd accused
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.