Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 4154 of 2009

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Judicial Review Misc. Appli. 22 of 2009 DAVID TIMAIYO & 66 OTHERS………………....…………………….PLAINTIFFS -VSKENYA NATIONAL EXAMINATION COUNCIL:………………….DEFENDANTS RULING The exparte application dated 15 th January, 2009 was ordered by this court to be heard interparties on 20 th January, 2009. I have taken into account the grounds as set out in the statement and the Affidavit including the oral submissions of Counsel. It is a principle of justice that like cases should be treated alike. The Principal issues in JR.Misc.21/09 are the same as in this application and I therefore grant leave in terms of prayer 1, 2 (i) and (ii). However, I decline to order that leave operates as stay as per prayer 3 or at all. I have done so in the exercise of the court unfettered discretion and I have taken into account the following considerations. i. The results in the English paper have been cancelled. ii. The pupils whose results were released or not cancelled have not been joined or served. Judicial review is about fairness. Education rights are vested in individuals under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the court in a full hearing has to balance Rule 15 (2) with the right to education for each pupil. iii. Any interim order could affect the selection rights of the other 2008 candidates before the ascertainment of the reasons for cancellation by the experts. iv. Appreciation of the fact that while cancellation of the examination results is drastic as against the pupils, and their future – at other end of the pendulum need on an examiner right might be justified in imposing appropriate sentences on examination cheats. v. There is need for the court to receive further evidence concerning the alleged, collusion or irregularity/misconduct and cancellation. As the parties agree on the need to reach finality as early as possible I order that the applicants file and serve the Notice of Motion within seven (7)days and that the matter be mentioned on 28 th January, 2009 for the purpose of allocating a priority hearing date. The Notice of Motion to be served on the Respondents on or before 23 rd January, 2009. Costs to abide the outcome of the Judicial Review application.

page 1 of 2

It is so ordered. Dated at Nairobi this 21st Day of January, 2009 J. G. Nyamu JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.