Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court of Kenya At Kakamega v Michael Lulumbi Musambayi :::::::::::::::::: Defendant

REPUBLIC OF KENYA HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA CIVIL CASE 84 OF 2008 GUNYAMA ANDREW GUNYAMA :::::::::::::::::::::: PLAINTIFF VERSUS MICHAEL LULUMBI MUSAMBAYI :::::::::::::::::: DEFENDANT RULING The application before me is for an interlocutory injunction, to restrain the defendant from alienating, laying claim to, trespassing onto, utilizing, developing, carrying out any works on, constructing on or in any other manner dealing with the suit property L. R. NO. ISUKHA/SHIRERE/2725, until the suit herein is heard and determined. The plaintiff asserts that he is the registered owner of the suit property. He produced a copy of the title deed for the said suit property. As the defendant did not file any replying affidavit, and in the light of the said title deed, I do find, on a prima facie basis, that the plaintiff is the registered proprietor of the suit property. Regardless of the fact that the plaintiff was the registered owner of the suit property, the defendant is said to have trespassed thereon, in October 2008. Again, the defendant did not deny that assertion, nor did he take any steps to justify to this court, his actions of moving onto the suit property. In the absence of any justification by the defendant, I hold, on a prima facie basis, that the defendant has no lawful authority to enter onto the suit property, or to do anything thereon.. In effect, I find and hold that the plaintiff has established a prima facie case against the defendant, and that the said case has a probability of success. As the defendant has started constructing a structure on the suit land, without the authority of the registered proprietor, I find that if the said construction, or any other construction by the defendant is allowed to proceed, the same would alter the character of the suit property, and would therefore cause the plaintiff to suffer irreparable loss and damage. In the event, the application before me is well merited. I therefore grant orders as prayed in the plaintiff’s application dated 5th November 2008. Dated, Signed and Delivered at Kakamega, this 5th day of February 2009 FRED A. OCHIENG JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.