REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Civil Case 10 of 2007 BAKARI ALI OGAPA & 245 OTHERS …………………..PLAINTIFFS VERSUS UNILEVER KENYA LTD. …………………………….....DEFENDANT RULING Application dated 3/2/2009 seeks order to dismiss this suit with costs. On 31/10/08 this court (Hon. Justice Lesiit) ordered security for costs in the sum of Kshs.306,250/= within 60 days of the order. No payment has been made. The application is supported by affidavit of Antoinette Absoloms. The court order is exhibited in default of plaintiff failing to provide security as ordered, the defendant be at liberty to apply. It was ordered. Upon hearing the arguments of both parties, I hold that court orders are to be obeyed unless there is an appeal or an application to vary or set aside the same no such action has been taken. If a party thinks the order is unjust, it must obey the order and thereafter appeal or set aside. As is it, the party against who the application is made, has done nothing, the same is allowed with costs by the plaintiff. It is so ordered. DATED and DELIVERED at Nairobi this 4th day of May 2009. JOYCE N. KHAMINWA JUDGE
Original judgment
Bakari Ali Ogapa & 245 Others v Unilever Kenya Ltd.
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.