Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

(milimani Law Courts) v Inspector General (corporation) & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CIVIL APPEAL 859 OF 2007 EDWARD MWANGI GAKURU…………...…...APPELLANT VERSUS INSPECTOR GENERAL (CORPORATION)………...RESPONDENT R U L I N G 1. By a notice of motion dated 16th February, 2009, Edward Mwangi Gakuru, the appellant herein seeks to have the order made on 9th February, 2009 reviewed. The orders sought to be reviewed granted the appellant a stay of execution of the judgment of the lower court pending the hearing and determination of his appeal in this court, on condition that he provides an appropriate bank guarantee for satisfaction of the decree for the sum of Kshs.1 million. 2. The appellant now pleads that due to poverty and unemployment he is unable to furnish the required bank guarantee. The appellant further contends that his former employer, Coffee Research foundation, is holding his terminal dues amounting to Kshs.839,519.50. He prays that the order made on 9th February, 2009, be reviewed to the extent of applying the sum of Kshs.839,519.50 being held by the Coffee Research foundation as security instead of the required 1 million. 3. The application is opposed through a replying affidavit sworn by Peter D. Ondiek the Inspector General of State Corporation. He depones that the application has been brought in bad faith simply to delay the legal process. It is contended that the Coffee Research Foundation is not a party to this proceeding. It is maintained that the appellant having failed to comply with the conditions imposed by the court, the order for stay of execution should be discharged. 4. I have carefully considered this application and the submissions made by the counsel. The appellant has availed evidence showing that the Coffee Research Foundation is holding certain monies arising out of the surcharge imposed by the Inspector of State Corporations. In the circumstances, I think it is fair and just that the court do review the order for security which was imposed on 9th February, 2009. 5. Accordingly, I grant the application and review the order as follows: (i) I set aside the order for deposit of the bank guarantee of Kshs.1 million.

page 1 of 2

(ii) That the sum of Kshs.839,519.50 being held by the Coffee Research Foundation shall remain with the Coffee Research foundation until this appeal is heard and determined. (iii) That the appellant shall either deposit a sum of Kshs.200,000/= into this court as further security or avail a bank guarantee for Kshs.200,000/= within 21 days from the date hereof. (iv) The appellant shall serve a copy of this order on the Coffee Research Foundation. Those shall be the orders of this court. Dated and delivered this 12th day of May, 2009 H. M. OKWENGU JUDGE In the presence of: Muli H/B for Muthama for the appellant Advocate for the respondent absent Erick – Court clerk

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.