REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS) Civil Suit 2123 of 2000 INDUSTRIAL & COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORTION (ICDC).................................................................... PLAINTIFF VERSUS NURU CHEMISTS LIMTIED .............................................. 1ST DEFENDNAT JAMES MASITA ISABOKE ................................................. 2ND DEFENDANT REBECA NYANCHAMA NYAKUNDI ................................ 3RD DEFENDANT RULING The plaintiff filed a suit seeking for a liquidated sum of Ksh.5.117,645/80 from the defendants. The sum is in respect of a loan advanced to the defendants pursuant to a loan agreement entered into, between the plaintiff and the defendants. The defendants filed a defence denying liability. The plaintiff filed a notice of motion seeking for summary judgment against the 1st, 2nd and 3rd defendants as specified in the plaint. This application is based on the grounds that the defendants’ defence is a sham as the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff pursuant to a loan agreement dated August 2000, and the indebtedness is admitted. The supporting affidavit by Isacc Budddy Mogaka gives further details of how the loan was granted, it was guaranteed by the 2nd and 3rd defendants. They failed to pay the loan which stood at Ksh. 5,117,645.80 as at 31st August 2000 attracting interest at 24%% per annum. The defendants despite having been served with this Notice of Motion have not filed a replying affidavit. Accordingly the plaintiff’s application is allowed and summary judgment is entered against the 1st, 2nd and 3rd defendants as prayed. Costs to the plaintiff. RULING READ AND SIGNED THIS 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2009. M.K. KOOME JUDGE
Original judgment
Industrial & Commercial Development Corportion (icdc) v Nuru Chemists Limtied & 2 others
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.