Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v 1. Gladys Kamene Nzomo 2. Sammy Daniel Kikongo 3. Denis Musyoki Kivaya

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MACHAKOS Criminal Case 84 of 2004 REPUBLIC VERSUS 1. GLADYS KAMENE NZOMO 2. SAMMY DANIEL KIKONGO 3. DENIS MUSYOKI KIVAYA .………...………… ACCUSED RULING 1. I have now had an opportunity to read the evidence on record. I am satisfied that the Republic has made out a prima facie case against the 1st and 2nd accused and I find that they have a case to answer. I will also put them on their respective defences. 2. The learned Principal State Counsel has however also urged the point that he may not have established a case against the 3rd accused. I disagree and I also find that from my reading of the record (and I am not obligated to give any reasons at this stage) I find that a prima facie case has similarly been made out against the 3rd accused person. 3. In the event all the accused persons have a case to answer and I hereby put them on their individual defences. 4. Orders accordingly. Dated and delivered at Machakos this 1st day of July 2009.

page 1 of 2

ISAAC LENAOLA JUDGE In presence of: Mr Wang’ondu for Republic Mr Sila for accused persons ISAAC LENAOLA JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.