Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 3253 of 2009

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS COMMERCIAL AND TAX DIVISION) CIVIL CASE 339 OF 2005 MATRIX TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD. …......................................……….... PLAINTIFF VERSUS SHEILA KINYA MAINGI t/a RIZIKI COMMUNICATIONS …………………... DEFENDANT RULING The application for summary judgment under Order 35 Civil Procedure Code, the amounts claimed are stated and it is by cheque which was given and not paid by bank. It is now a criminal offence to issue cheques which are not supported by cash in the bank. The defendant admits having issued these cheques and then says she stopped payment. The excuse she gives for stopping the payment is not satisfactory. She says she was in business with plaintiff for a long time. I find it not truthful to say that she did not know about the debt. I find no merit in the statement of defence. I find no triable issue and I allow the application and grant orders as prayed with costs to the applicant. It is so ordered. DATED, DELIVERED and SIGNED this 16th day of July 2009. JOYCE N. KHAMINWA JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.