REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS Civil Case 602 of 2007 JOEL KAMAU KIBE ………………………………………..PLAINTIFF VERSUS THE KENYA ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO. LTD. ……DEFENDANT RULING Application dated 17/4/09 Notice of Motion seeks to correct an arithmetical mistake appearing in the ruling given on 27/3/2009 by this court. According to the record the judgment was entered for plaintiff against the defendant in the sum of Kshs.6,510,000/= and not Kshs.6,590,000/=. The prayer 3 of the notice of motion seeks order for costs. The suit has been finalized. However, the costs of the suit was not granted to the successful party. Only costs of application was awarded. The plaintiff had indicated he would proceed with prayer (c) and (e) of the Plaint namely, special damages and costs. The plaintiff proceeded to withdraw prayer (c) on special damages and therefore only prayers for costs is outstanding. Normally as stated in the Civil Procedure Act costs follow the event the winner is awarded the costs. Since the suit has now come to a conclusion, I find that the plaintiff is entitled to 90% of the costs which the defendant is entitled to 10% being the costs of withdrawn prayer. It is so ordered. Judgment is correct to read “Kshs.6,510,000/=”. DATED and DELIVERED at Nairobi this 18th day of 2009. JOYCE N. KHAMINWA JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.