Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Mue Kyau’s Family Land Dispute Thro’ Charles Mue v Makau Mue

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS CIVIL APPEAL 89 OF 2002 MUE KYAU’S FAMILY LAND DISPUTE Thro’ CHARLES MUE …………………….… APPELLANT VERSUS MAKAU MUE ……………….....…………. RESPONDENT (Being an appeal from the Ruling of Honourable M.N. Gicheru P.M dated 9th August 2002 in Principal Magistrate Civil Case No. 49 of 2001) JUDGMENT 1.On 22/9/2008, I delivered a preliminary judgment in this matter and left two issues to be addressed in this final judgement viz; i. the outcome of the Appeal to the Provincial Appeals Committee by the Respondent in this Appeal; ii.the status of PM’S Succ. Cause No. 97/1998 (Kitui). 2. I called for evidence on the two issues before I could conclude the judgment and I now have two documents before me; a.Certificate of Confirmation of Grant issued in H.C.Succ. Cause 97/1998 (Nbi) relating to the estate of Mue Kyau (deceased). The earlier reference to PM’S Succ. Cause 97/1998 (Kitui) was therefore in error. The estate of the deceased was distributed in that Cause and one of the properties to be distributed was title No. Matinyani/Kalindilo/156 which was PARTLY the subject of the Appeal before me. Amongst the individuals to inherit that parcel of land was one Makau Mue, the present Respondent. b. As regards Eastern Provincial Appeals Committee Appeal No. 102/2001, by letter dated 14/10/2008, one S.M. Kariuki visiting on behalf of the Provincial Commissioner, Eastern Province, the Appeal is still pending and no decision has been made in that regard. 3.Turning back to the judgment that I delivered on 22/9/2008, it would seem to me that I should conclude the whole Appeal by stating thus;

page 1 of 2

Inspite of the pendency of the Appeal to the Provincial Land Appeals Committee, the Appeal before me has merit and is allowed as prayed with costs to the Appellant. This final judgment must be read as part of the one delivered on 22/9/2008. Costs of the Appeal shall be borne individually by each party. 4.Orders accordingly. Dated and delivered at Machakos this 28th day of May 2009. ISAAC LENAOLA JUDGE In presence of: ISAAC LENAOLA JUDGE N/A for parties

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.