Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Procedure (revised) Rules, The Local Government Act, Cap. 265

REPUBLIC OF KENYA REPUBLIC…………………………………………………………………………. APPLICANT VERSUS IN THE MATTER OF JUDICIAL REVIEW UNDER ORDER LIII OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE (REVISED) RULES, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT, CAP. 265 AND FOR LEAVE TO APPLY FOR ORDERS OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS AND PROHIBITION AND IN THE MATTER OF STAY OF PUBLICATION OF ELECTIONS IN THE KENYA GAZETTE AND THE NULLIFICATION OF THE ILLEGAL, UNLAWFUL AND IRREGULAR CIVIL ELECTIONS FOR THE OLKEJUADO COUNTY COUNCIL HELD ON 1ST JULY. 2009 AND ORDERS FOR FRESH ELCTIONS AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY THE COUNTY COUNCIL OF THE OLKEJUADO COUNTY COUNCIL PETER SANKALE KURRINYO……………...……………….……….. 1ST APPLICANT PARSERETI OLE NGOMEA…………………………………….….…..2ND APPLICANT PAUL TONKEI LORKINYIEI ………………………………….......…... 3RD APPLICANT JOHN MAINA MUTIGA………………………………...…….……….… 4TH APPLICANT KAPURUA SOINE………………………………...……………..…….... 5TH APPLICANT SOLITEI MEELI……………………………………...…..……………..... 6TH APPLICANT KARIUKI FELIX……………...…………………………..…….………… 7TH APPLICANT JAMES PAREYIO…………………………………………….…..……….8TH APPLICANT PETER MUNENE MUNYU……………………….…………………...…9TH APPLICANT HENRY KIMITI..……………………………………..…………..…….…10TH APPLICANT SOPHIA KISAU……………………….……..……………………….….11TH APPLICANT

page 1 of 3

JANE SARUNI………………………………..……………………..…. .12TH APPLICANT MOSES NAILOLE…………….....…………….…………………….…. 13TH APPLICANT MESHACK LENKOINA……………………...……………….….……...14TH APPLICANT TIMOTHY SAIGILU………………………………..…………………..…15TH APPLICANT JAMES KUYA……………………………………………………….…....16TH APPLICANT SARINKE PARPOKA…………………………………………………....17TH APPLICANT STEPHEN SARBABI…………………………………………...……….18TH APPLICANT DAVID ASSAPE……………………………………….........……………19TH APPLICANT DANIEL NAIKUNI……………………………………………….……….20TH APPLICANT JULIUS NTAYIA………………………………………….........................21ST APPLICANT SAIME OLE LONKOI…………………………………………..........…...22ND APPLICANT MAKUI WUNTAI…………………………………........................……….23RD APPLICANT JOHN MATINDA…………………………………………...........………..24TH APPLICANT NJARO OLE KILEU……………………………………………….....…..25TH APPLICANT MEITAMEI LONINA…………………………………………………..…..26TH APPLICANT JOSHUA OLO WUASA…………………………...................……....…..27TH APPLICANT AND IN THE MATTER OF THE PERMANENT SECRETARY LOCAL GOVERNMENT.….... 1ST RESPONDENT THE CLERK OF THE OLKEJUADO COUNCIL COUNCIL…...... 2ND RESPONDENT INDEPENDENT INTERIM ELECTORAL COMMISSION…...…... 3RD RESPONDENT ATTORNEY GENERAL….…….………………….………….……..….4TH RESPODENT TARAYIA OLE KORES………………………………………...……. 5TH RESPONDENT LENTIYO KURAO NKOKUA………………………………….……. 6TH RESPONDENT SIMON NKAO METITO……………………………………………… 7TH RESPONDENT RULING

page 2 of 3

This is a Chamber Summons dated 14th July, 2009 filed by M/s Naikuni Ngaah & Miecha advocates on behalf of 27 applicants. There are 7 respondents named. It was brought under Order LIII rule 1, 2(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules and seeks leave to challenge purported elections of the Ole Kejuado County Council. I have also been asked to grant that leave do operate as a stay. The application is supported by STATUTORY STATEMENT and a VERIFYING AFFIDAVIT. Mr. Naikuni for the applicants also addressed me emphasizing that an election of the County Council Committee officials held on 1st July, 2007 was irregular, and therefore called for judicial review reliefs. Having considered the application, I am of the view that leave be granted to commence judicial review proceedings. The applicants have an arguable have an arguable case. As for stay, I find no compelling reason to grant same, since in my view the interest’s of the operations of the County Council, on the face of it, have to be protected as against the interests of any party or group. Such stay orders are not advisable or desirable at this threshold stage. Consequently, I orders as follows1. Leave is granted to the applicants to file judicial review proceedings for certiorari, mandamus and prohibition. The Notice of Motion will be filed within 21 days. 2. I decline to grant a stay orders. 3. Costs will follow the decision of the Notice of Motion to be filed. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 27th day of July, 2009. George Dulu Judge

page 3 of 3

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.