REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI Civil Case 215 of 2005 SAMNEL INSURANCE BROKERS LTD:……………… …..PLAINTIFF VERSUS SANTACK ENTERPRISES LTD & 3 OTHERS:............….DEFENDANT RULING The Third Defendant has taken out a Notice of Motion to have the plaintiff’s suit dismissed for want of prosecution and for costs of the application. It is based on the ground that for over two years and five months since the suit was adjourned generally the plaintiff has taken no action whatsoever to progress it. The Application was served on all other parties herein and none has filed any opposition to it. A perusal of the court file indicates that the matter was last in court on 6/10/2005 when under a certificate of urgency interim injunctive orders were granted to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff has lost interest in the suit henceforth. The continued existence of this case in the court serves the sole purpose of taking up registry space. I have considered the Application and find this a suitable suit for dismissal. The suit as against the Third Defendant is consequently dismissed with costs. DATED IN ELDORET THIS 27TH DAY OF JANUARY 2009 P.M. MWILU JUDGE DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT NAIROBI THIS 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2009. J. KHAMINWA JUDGE IN THE PRESENCE OF:……………………………..Advocate for the Plaintiff ………………………………Advocate for the 1st Defendant ……………………………….Advocate for the 2nd Defendant ……………………………….Advocate for the 3rd Defendant
Original judgment
Samnel Insurance Brokers Ltd: v Santack Enterprises Ltd & 3 Others:
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.