REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS) Civil Case 372 of 2006 ALEX S. MASIKA:…………………………………PLAINTIFF VERSUS EPCO BUILDERS LIMITED:…………………DEFENDANT RULING The Plaintiff herein ALEX S. MASIKA is the Applicant herein. He moves the court under Order XXXV Rules 1 (1) a, (2) (3) and 9 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act and all enabling provisions of the Law that summary judgment be entered for the plaintiff against the Defendant in the sum of Kshs.1, 191,006.80 being the taxed sum in the suit. It is brought on the grounds that the Defendant is truly and justly indebted to the plaintiff and the sum due is the taxed costs between Advocate and client. That the defence filed is a sham not disclosing any triable issues and it is likely to delay the fair trial of the suit herein. The Application is supported by the supporting Affidavit of the Applicant which explains the events leading to the amount being claimed now. Nothing is filed in opposition thereto. I have given due consideration to this application. I have seen the annexure marked ASM 8 which is the certificate of Taxation issued in HC.CC.Mis. Civil Application No.952 of 2006. I find that the amount sought is properly due and the defence as filed does not in any way challenge it. I accordingly enter judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of Kshs.1, 191,006.80 together with costs of the Application and of the suit. Orders accordingly. DATED AT ELDORET THIS 11TH DAY OF MAY, 2009. P. M. MWILU JUDGE DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 15TH DAY OF MAY, 2009. J. W. LESIIT JUDGE IN THE PRESENCE OF:………………………..Court Clerk ……………………….Advocate for the Plaintiff …………………………Defendant
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.