Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 2017 of 2009

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA Criminal Case 29 of 2008 REPUBLIC........................................................................PROSECUTOR VERSUS GERALD CHIBAYI ESIKURI ......................................... 1ST ACCUSED DENNIS AMANYA AWAY...............................................2ND ACCUSED MELZADECK NGOTA ....................................................3RD ACCUSED SENTENCE The three accused persons were charged with murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. They denied the charge. The prosecution reduced the charge to manslaughter to which the accused pleaded guilty. The particulars of the offence are that on the 18th day of June, 2008 at Mungoya village, Emukola Sublocation, West Bunyore location in Emuhaya District of Western Provice, the three accused unlawfully killed HARRISON MUKAKA. On 18th June, 2008 the deceased who was the accused’s uncle arrived home drunk at 8.00 p.m. He started beating his young son and his wife who was 9 months pregnant. Then ran to the deceased’s mother’s house but the deceased followed them and went on to beat them together with his mother using a whip. The three accused came out from their respective houses in response to the screams made by the deceased’s mother, wife and child. The deceased turned onto the three accused and started whipping them. They managed to restrain him, tied him with a rope and took him to Ebukolo A.P. Camp where the deceased was placed in the cells. Unfortunately the deceased passed away on the same night. A postmortem done by Dr. Limo revealed that the deceased’s death was due to cadiorespiratory failure secondary to hemorrhage and ruptured spleen. Mrs. Muleshe for the accused submitted that the accused are remorseful and that their intention was to restrain the deceased and not to kill him. The third accused is 15 years and was to join a polytechnic having just completed his standard eight exams. The other two accused are orphans. Taking into account the circumstance under which the deceased met his death, it is clear that none of the accused intended to kill the deceased. The accused persons respondent to the screams by the deceased’s wife, mother and child. They took him to the police that night. The deceased was drunk and fought everyone. I am convinced that a custodial sentence is not ideal under the circumstances taking into account the fact that the accused persons have been in custody for over one year. The accused are hereby set at liberty and shall be free unless otherwise lawfully held. Delivered, Dated and Signed at Kakamega this 23rd .day of September, 2009 SAID J. CHITEMBWE

page 1 of 2

JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.