Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Roselyne Adhiambo Ochieng & 2 others v Ferdinard Ndungwaititu & 2 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS Election Petition 33 of 2008 ROSELYNE ADHIAMBO OCHIENG................1ST PETITIONER CHARLES OTIENO ATULA..............................2ND PETITIONER MARY WANGUI NDERITU................................3RD PETITIONER VERSUS FERDINARD NDUNGWAITITU.....................1ST RESPONDENT ELECTRORAL COMMISSION OF KENYA.2ND RESPONDENT FRED N MUTUA...............................................3RD RESPONDENT RULING 1. The application before me is dated the 25th of September, 2009 brought pursuant to Rules 23 & 24 of the National Assembly Elections (Election Petition) Rules, 1993. Seeking leave to have the 1st, 2nd and third Petitioners withdraw the petition. 2. The 1st Respondent and his Advocate Mr Kioko Kilukumi filed affidavits in compliance with Rule 23 & 24 of the said Rules. 3. The 2nd and 3rd Respondents did not file replying affidavits Mr. Gikonyo for the 2nd and 3rd Respondent informed the Court that the Chairman of the (IIEC) Interim Independent Electoral Commission has been out of the country. 4 He urged the Court to dispense with the affidavit pursuant to Rule 23 (2) of the said Rules. 5. Having heard submissions by learned counsel for the parties, I hereby order as follows:1. Leave be and is hereby granted to the Petitioners to withdraw the Petition.

page 1 of 2

2. I award costs to the Respondents. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 6th day of November, 2009. ALI- ARONI JUDGE 6/11/2009 Ruling delivered in the presence …………………………… for Petitioners ………………………….. for 1st Respondent ………………………… for 2nd and 3rd Respondents

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.