Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 968 of 2009

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAKURU JUDICIAL REVIEW 60 OF 2009 WILLIAM LANGAT ……………………….... APPLICANT VERSUS MAU NAROK DIVISION LAND DISPUTE TRIBUNAL ……………………….. RESPONDENT JOSEPH KORIR SINDAI …….…..……INTERESTED PARTY RULING After obtaining the requisite leave, William Langat, the Ex-parte applicant, seeks under Order 53 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules an order of certiorari to quash the decision of the Mau Narok Land Disputes Tribunal in respect of the piece of land known as Title No. Nakuru/Sururu/1561, which was subsequently adopted by the Chief Magistrate in Land Dispute Case No. 13 of 2007. As the application seeks to quash an order made on 8th November, 2006, more than six months before it was filed, and not the Chief Magistrate’s order adopting it, the same is incompetent for fouling the provisions of Order 53 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules. In the circumstances the same is hereby struck out. DATED and delivered this 15th day of October, 2009. D.K. MARAGA JUDGE.

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.