Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 964 of 2009

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII Miscellaneous Application 55 of 2009 JAMES OGATA NYANTENGA..............................APPLICANT -VERUS1. THE CLERK KEROKA TOWN CUNCIL ) 2. KEROKA TOWN COUNCIL )........RESPONDENTS RULING On 14/7/200l the Chief Magistrate’s court at Kisii gave judgment for the applicant against the respondents in the following terms: “the Defendants, their agents or servants are hereby restrained from demolishing the plaintiff’s premises on plot no. East Kitutu/Mwamangera/1376. In the alternative full compensation should be made before the demolition. Costs of the suit to the plaintiff.” Following that the respondents demolished the premises. A contempt application was successfully made in the High Court in respect of which a fine of Kshs. 20,000/= was imposed. The applicant sought to be compensated for the demolition and engaged a quantity surveyor to work out the value. It came to kshs. 3,745,200/=. This was beyond the monetary jurisdiction of the subordinate court. This is why an application is now being made before this court under sections 3 and 34(1) and (2) of the Civil Procedure Act to have an order made to withdraw and transfer to itself the subordinate court case for the purposes of the execution of the decree. This court listened to Mr. Momanyi on the application and also to Mr. Ntabo in response. The subordinate court ordered for compensation but did not asses the amount of compensation. Mr. Momanyi informed court that after the quantity surveyor came up with his figure notice was sent to the respondents to pay, but that there was neither response nor payment. There is no decree in respect of the mount of damage as there has been no assessment. Mr. Momanyi thought the subordinate court could not deal with the assessment because of issue of jurisdiction. He needed to come to this court under section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act. Sections 3 and 34 of the Civil Procedure Act are not applicable to the circumstances of this application. It follows that the application incompetent and is struck out with costs. Dated, signed and delivered at Kisii this 11th day of November, 2009. A.O.MUCHELULE JUDGE

page 1 of 2

11/11/2009 11/11/2009 Before A.O.Muchelule-J Court clerk-Mongare Mr.Moracha for Respondent COURT: Ruling in open court. A.O.MUCHELULE JUDGE 11/11/2009

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.