Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Karimi Muthuma v Joseph Ngombia Kibara & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU Succession Cause 2 of 2004 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF MUTHUMA GITHINJI……DSD KARIMI MUTHUMA………………………..RESPONDENT/DECEASED VERSUS JOSEPH NGOMBIA KIBARA………………………………….APPLICANT JOYCE WANJA NJOGU…………………………………..1ST RESPONDENT WANJIRA NJOGU…………………………………………..2ND RESPONDENT RULING The Application before me is wrongly intituled as is pits a deceased Karimi Muthuma Respondent/Deceased –versus Joseph Ngombia Kibara- Applicant Joyce Wanja Njogu- 1st Respondent Wanjira Njogu - 2nd Respondent I have agonized as to whether I should proceed to determine the same on its merits but I strongly feel that the defect renders it fatally defective and it having been filed by a qualified advocate, it should not be allowed to proceed the way it is. Even as I strike it out, I invite counsel for the applicant to note that his annexure “JNK III” does not have a valid date and it may not be of much help to him. I accordingly strike out this application with orders that each party bear its own costs. W. KARANJA JUDGE Delivered, signed and dated at Embu this 2nd day of Nov 2009 In presence of:-N/A by either party

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.