REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA OF KISII Civil Suit 34 of 2006 ZAVERCHAND PADAMSHI SHAH………………………..PLAINTIFF -VERSUSNATIONAL CEREALS & PRODUCE BOARD…………DEFENDANT RULING Mfi -10, 11 and 12 are relevant to the matters in issue as they show that the plaintiff was the owner of the goods he alleges went missing and for which he blames the defendant. He stated that he was the owner of the goods because he bought them. MFI-10 is the agreement signed between him and the seller. MFI-11 is the invoice the seller sent to him and MFI-12 is the delivery note sent along with the goods. As it were, the documents amount to receipt issued for the goods. They were issued to him. He can produce them as evidence of ownership. It is notable that these documents are in their original form. Dated, signed and delivered at Kisii this 2 nd day of November,2009 A.O.MUCHELULE JUDGE 2/11/2009 Before Hon. A.O.Muchelule-Judge Court clerk-Mongare Mr. Bosire-present COURT: Ruling in open court. A.O.MUCHELULE JUDGE 2/11/2009
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.