Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 785 of 2009

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA OF KISII Civil Case 155 of 2009 DUNCAN OTIENO OGWANG (suing as administrator to the estate of JOSEPH OGWANG ZABLON-DECEASED)……………………….PLAINTIFF -VERSUSTIMOTHY OBIERO……………………………………….DEFENDANT RULING The respondent was served with summons to enter appearance and the application but did not respond, either by entering appearance and filing defence or by replying to the affidavit. The averments by the applicant were therefore not controverted. There is leasehold property comprised in Kisii Municipality Block 111/152 which is registered in the names of the deceased Joseph Ogwang Zablon and Jane Kerubo Ogori, each having half-share. Joseph died and was succeeded by the plaintiff Duncan Otieno Ogwang. The respondent has occupied the deceased’s share, and this is without permission or lawful reason. This application was brought for mandatory injunction to have him vacate the premises while the suit is waiting to be determined. A mandatory injunction can only be granted at this stage where the issues are clear and straight forward. The case has to be unusually strong, compared to that of prohibitory injunction. (See East Africa Fine Spinners Ltd .V. Bedi Investments Ltd, Civil Application no. 72 of 1994 at Nairobi). I am satisfied that the applicant has provided that assurance. The application is granted with costs. Dated, signed and delivered at Kisii this 6 th Day of November, 2009 A.O.MUCHELULE JUDGE 6/11/2009 6/11/2009

page 1 of 2

Before Hon. A.O.Muchelule-J Court clerk-Mongare Mr. Minda for the applicant COURT: ruling in open court. A.O.MUCHELULE JUDGE 6/11/2009

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.