Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 543 of 2009

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS Succession Cause 1692 of 2009 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH VICTOR WACHIIRA KAMBORA (DECEASED) RULING Before me is a Summons dated 27th March, 2009 filed by Gacdhia & Mucheru advocates for the applicants named as WINNIE WANJIRU KAMBORA and JANE WANJIKU KIGATHI, who are the administrators of the estate of the late JOSEPH VICTOR WACHIRA KAMBORA. The substantive prayer in the application is that1. The certificate of confirmation of grant issued on 27th March, 2007 be rectified to include Title No. Kjd/Kaputiei – North/4649 to be distributed to Winnie Wanjiru Kambora. The application is supported by the affidavit sworn by WINNIE WANJIRU KAMBORA on 27th March 2009. It was deposed in the said affidavit inter alia, that plot herein was inadvertently left out at confirmation of the grant because the title document was with one Timothy Mutio at Nairobi. It was further deposed that the purpose of the rectification was that the property be vested in the name of Winnie Wanjiru Kambora, so that it can be transferred to Timothy Mutio, who had paid for the purchase of the plot. I have considered the application and have also perused the consents of the co-administrator and the beneficiaries which were filed. I find no reason to decline the application. Consequently, I allow the application and order as follows1. The certificate of confirmation of grant issued on 27th March, 2007 be and is hereby rectified to include the Title No. Kjd/kaputiei – North/4649 to be distributed to Winnie Wanjiru Kambora. 2. Costs in the cause.

page 1 of 2

Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 17th day of November, 2009. George Dulu Judge.

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.