Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Fredrick Njiru Nyaga v Vinzenza Rwamba Njiru

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU Civil Appeal 39 of 2002 FREDRICK NJIRU NYAGA…………………………...…….APPELLANT VERSUS VINZENZA RWAMBA NJIRU……………………………RESPONDENT JUDGMENT ON APPEAL This appeal arises out of Succession Case wherein the lower court made order distributing the 6 ¼ acres of the deceased land among beneficiaries. The grounds of appeal as set out in the memorandum of appeal dated 29/1/2007 (with leave). The first ground is that the Trial Magistrate appointed 8 persons to be administrators of the estate. This is contrary to provisions of Section 56 (1) (b) which limits the number of administrators to 4 persons in respect of same estate. Regarding issue numbered 2, 3, 4 distribution of a deceased estate intestate is set out in the Succession Act. The court has to distribute the estate as provided. The evidence here shows that the survivors were 6 daughters and one son distribution is subject to Section 38 of the Act. The estate should be distributed according to law unless parties agree otherwise. Concerning ground 5 the value of the estate for purpose of conferring jurisdiction has to be proved not just alleged. I find no evidence of the value of the land. Upon considering the above I find that the appeal succeeds the grounds of appeal have merit. The appeal is therefore allowed. Since this dispute involves members of the same family, no order is made as to costs. Each party to meet its own costs. Orders accordingly. Dated this 18th January, 2008. J. N. KHAMINWA JUDGE 18/1/2008 Khaminwa- Judge Njue – Clerk

page 1 of 2

Mr. Kathungu Ms Wairimu Read in open court J. N. KHAMINWA JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.