Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Kasmil Ondieki v 1. Clerk Kisii Municipal Council 2. Andrew N. Onguti

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII CIVIL CASE 280 OF 2002 KASMIL ONDIEKI ……………………………….……. PLAINTIFF VERSUS 1. CLERK KISII MUNICIPAL COUNCIL 2. ANDREW N. ONGUTI…................................…… DEFENDANT RULING The plaintiff filed an application dated 6th March, 2007 pursuant to the provisions of Order XXIII rules 2 and 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules. He prayed that an entry be made on the record to the effect that the cause of action continues against the surviving defendant, the first defendant, the second defendant having died on 8th June, 2004. The plaintiff had sued the defendants for allegedly interfering with his property known as DARAJA MBILI/PLOT 15. The plaintiff’s case had been closed at the time of the second defendant’s demise. Since then, no grant of representation had been applied for by any one. It is not in dispute that the plaintiff’s cause of action against the first defendant is still subsisting despite the demise of the second defendant. The plaintiff’s application was not opposed. I grant the orders as sought. There will be no order as to costs. DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at KISII this 23rd day of April, 2008. D. MUSINGA JUDGE. Delivered in open court in the presence of Mr. Ombachi for the plaintiff N/A for the defendant D. MUSINGA JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.