REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU Ciivil Case 25 of 1996 NJERU KIRIE …………………………………………….1ST PLAINTIFF KIRINGA NJIRU……………………………..……………2ND PLAINTIFF GICIEBU GICEKO…………………………..……………3RD PLAINTIFF NGARI KABINGU…………………………….....…………4TH PLAINTIFF VERSUS LAWRENCE MURIUKI………………………...……….1ST DEFENDANT JOSEPH MWAI MUCHOKI…………………………….2ND DEFENDANT AMBROSIUS NYAGA RURI………………….….……..3RD DEFENDANT NDWIGA MUKUNDI……………………….…….………4TH DEFENDANT NJIRU MUTUA…………………………………..……….5TH DEFENDANT RULING This suit was filed on 15/3/1996 by way of Originating Summons. On 4/6/2004 the suit was dismissed for want of prosecution over a period of 8 years. Then on 5/10/2007 the plaintiff filed an application to set aside the dismissal and reinstate the suit. The supporting affidavit states that the plaintiffs did not have funds to prosecute the suit but they are willing to take action if the dismissal was to be set aside. The application is opposed in addition to the delay of 8 years the applicants took a further period of over 3 years before filing this application. The explanation given for failure to take action in prosecuting the suit is not satisfactory. The suit was already in court for what funds were required? I find there is inordinate delay in this case which is not explained. The application is dismissed with costs to Respondents Dated this 28th January, 2008. J. N. KHAMINWA JUDGE
Original judgment
Njeru Kirie & 3 others v Lawrence Muriuki & 4 others
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.