REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA OF KISII Criminal Appeal 204 of 2006 OKEROSI MWENCHA ALIAS OGINGA …………. APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC ………………………………...……... RESPONDENT (From original conviction and sentence in the Resident Magistrate’s Court at Kehancha, Criminal Case no.1176 of 2005 by M. K. K. SEREM, RM) JUDGMENT On 10th January, 2006 the appellant was convicted of the charges of indecent assault of a female and assault causing actual bodily harm contrary to sections 144(1) and 251 of the Penal code respectively. He was sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment on the first count and 5 years’ imprisonment on the second count. The sentences were to run concurrently. He was aggrieved by the said sentence and preferred an appeal to this court. Mr. Kemo, Principal State Counsel, conceded the appeal, and in my view rightly so, on the basis that the learned trial magistrate was a Resident Magistrate at the time. Section 7 of the Criminal Procedure Code does not allow such a magistrate to pass a sentence exceeding 7 years’ imprisonment except for offences under sections 278, 308(1) 322 of the Penal Code or under the Sexual Offences Act, 2006 which came into operation on 21st July 2006. The trial court did not have jurisdiction to pass the sentence which it did. The appellant has been in custody for more than two years. He has been punished sufficiently and I believe he has also had time to reflect on his actions. I allow the appeal and reduce the sentence to the period already served. The appellant is set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED at Kisii this 7th day of March 2008. D. MUSINGA JUDGE. Judgment delivered in open court. Accused present. Mr. Kemo for the Republic D. MUSINGA JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.