Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Julius Kamau Kithaka & 1 other v Waruguru Kithaka

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU Misc Appli 82 of 2007 JULIUS KAMAU KITHAKA………...……………………1ST APPLICANT ROSEMARY NJOKI NGARI…………….……………….2ND APPLICANT VERSUS WARUGURU KITHAKA…………...……………………..RESPONDENT RULING This Application arises out of succession matter. The order complained of was made on 18/3/97 to preserve the estate. It is clear this was an interlocutory order made pending hearing inter partes. It is stated from the bar that there is an application pending for Revocation of grant. It is submitted that it has been pending for the last 10 years. All the same the court is being requested to review and set aside the said exparte order on the face of it the order expired on 10/4/97, when the application was to be heard inter- partes there is no evidence as to what happened after inter partes hearing. It appears there is no ground to satisfy the requirements under Order 44 CPC. It is simply that the parties went to sleep on their rights and has not taken any steps over the 10 years. I am not satisfied that there is reason to set aside the order. The succession case is still pending and it is important to protect the assets until the final orders of court are made. I dismiss application with no orders as to costs. Dated this 13th February, 2008. J. N. KHAMINWA JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.