REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Civil Suit 356 of 2005 PETER KANYAGO ………………………….......……………………………… PLAINTIFF VERSUS THE STANDARD LIMITED ………………......…………………… FIRST DEFENDANT MANAGING EDITOR THE STANDARD NEWSPAPER ……SECOND DEFENDANT KAMAU NGOTHO ……………………………...............………….. THIRD DEFENDANT RULING From what has been brought to my attention during the hearing of this chamber summons dated 4th October, 2006, it is my considered opinion that what Mr. Gitonga, Counsel for the Respondents, has said that what the Defence has so far done is sufficient and that Mr. Kibaara and his client, the Plaintiff, through the chamber summons herein in effect seek to be provided with the Defendant’s evidence is correct. In the circumstances therefore, the said chamber summons is hereby dismissed with costs to the Respondents. Dated this 22nd day of May, 2008. J.M. KHAMONI JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.