Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Jerusha Nguru Gitau & 1 other v Patrick Mburu Nyaga Amos Gitau

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU Succession 1373 of 2002 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF AMOS GITAU GIKUBIA (DECEASED) AND JERUSHA NGURU GITAU…………………………………………1ST PETITIONER MICHAEL NYAGA AMOS………………………………..…………2ND PETITIONER VERSUS PATRICK MBURU NYAGA AMOS GITAU…………..…………………OBJECTOR JUDGMENT Application dated 14/11/2005 seeks orders for confirmation of grant issued by court on 16/5/2005. The affidavit in support of the application gives identifications of the beneficiaries. It is disclosed that the deceased had 2 wives one of who has died. There is disagreement in the proposals for distribution. Patrick Mburu Nyaga and some of beneficiaries file a protest alleging that one of the application for confirmation got lost and therefore he wishes both proposals to be considered. He exhibited some two green cards which show that that father deceased was registered as proprietor on 10.3.96 and on 16/5/1974 it is recorded the father died. The land to be distributed is identified as:1. Ngandori/Kirigi/887 2. Ngandori/Kirigi/2313 These are the assets. The protestor proposes that each survivor to be given their shares separately so that all have equal shares. This being a polygamous home section 40 succession Act applies the assets should be shared by each house in accordance according to the number of children adding mother as an additional unit. I therefore find the proposed distribution by the administrator fair and in accordance with the law. The grant is hereby confirmed and I order the certificate to issue as proposed by administrators. No order as to costs. Dated this 7th April, 2008. J. N. KHAMINWA JUDGE

page 1 of 2

7/4/2008 Khaminwa – Judge Njue – Clerk Mr. J. Kathungu present All interested parties present Read in open court. J. N. KHAMINWA JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.