REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU Civil Case 4 of 2008 MARTIN NYAGA NJAGI…………………………………PLAINTIFF VERSUS CO-OPERATIVE BANK OF KENYA ..……………..DEFENDANT RULING The plaintiff application sought an exparte injunction under certificate of urgency. The exparte order pending hearing inter partes has long expired in view of Order 39 rule 3 (2) However for unknown reasons the application has fixed the matter for hearing inter partes on 17/9/2008. This promoted the Applicant defendant to seek orders to discharge the ex parte order as provided under order 39 Rule 4. Upon considering the argument of counsel and upon residing the Application and annexures, I am not satisfied the conditions laid down in the case of Cassmen Brown namely that the Applicant for interlocutory injunction must satisfy the court that he has a case with good chance of success and that the case is such that an award in damages cannot adequately compensate the Application and in case of doubt the court will apply the rule of convenience. From the proceedings the plaintiff has admitted the lending contract and his inability to service the loan in compliance with the terms of contract the court cannot interfere with contract entered in freely. For the above I find that an interlocutory injunction cannot issue in favour of the plaintiff. I therefore discharge Ex parte order already expired. I also dismiss the plaintiff’s interlocutory application dated 21/1/2008. All costs to the Respondent/Defendant. It is so ordered. Dated this 5th May, 2008. J. N. KHAMINWA JUDGE 5/5/2008 Khaminwa – Judge Njue- Clerk
page 1 of 2
Mr. Maondo for Defendant/Applicant Mr. Kenneth Githinji for Plaintiff/Respondent Read in open court. J. N. KHAMINWA JUDGE
page 2 of 2