Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Order of Certiorari v Chairman Embu District Land Dispute Tribunal & 3 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU Misc. Appli. 23 of 2007. IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY NYAGA RUBIRUTHI FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW ORDER OF CERTIORARI AND IN THE MATTER OF THE LAND DISPUTES TRIBUNAL ACT NO. 18 OF 1990 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE EMBU DISTRICT LAND DISPUTES TRIBUNAL COMMITTEE REPUBLIC………………………………………………………………..APPLICANT VERSUS CHAIRMAN EMBU DISTRICT LAND DISPUTE TRIBUNAL……………………………………………..1ST RESPONDENT ANISIA WARUE NYAGA………………………………………….2ND RESPONDENT JUSTIN NJIRU NYAGA……………………………………………3RD RESPONDENT JOHN MUNYI NYAGA……………………………………………...4TH RESPONDENT RULING The decision of the Tribunal is hereby quashed on ground that the decision forwarded to the subordinate court to be read was contrary to the provisions of laws and was without the jurisdiction granted to Tribunals under Section 3 (1) of Land Disputes Tribunals the issues arising are not regarding subdivision of land right to work on land, or trespass to land. The tribunal had no authority to issue orders directed to the police it investigate criminal issues. Again the award was unlawful. There is no law entitling the children to interfere with their father’s assets in his lifetime. They have to wait until he expires and then the provisions of Succession Act shall apply. The application is allowed orders granted as prayed the Respondents and the Tribunal shall pay the costs of this application to the ex parte applicant. It is so ordered. Dated this 21st April, 2008. J. N. KHAMINWA JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.