Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Eunice Jepkemei Toroitich v Housing Finance Co. (k) Ltd

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU Civil Case 123 of 2000 EUNICE JEPKEMEI TOROITICH…….……….PLAINTIFF VERSUS HOUSING FINANCE CO. (K) LTD…………DEFENDANT RULING In its notice of motion dated 31st January 2008, the defendant seeks under Order 16 Rule 5(c) and (d) of the Civil Procedure Rules and Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, the dismissal of this case for want of prosecution on the ground that the plaintiff appears to have lost interest in the case as she has not taken any step to prosecute it. Although served the plaintiff has not even attempted to oppose this application. I agree with the averments in the affidavit of Mr. Kisilah Daniel Gor in support of the application that since the close of pleadings on or about 20th April 2000, the plaintiff has not taken any step to prosecute this case. After filing this suit and obtaining an interlocutory injunction which was later set aside, the plaintiff has exhibited an unenthusiastic attitude towards this case. The three hearing dates on 4th April 2005, 22nd June 2006 and 17th November 2006 were all taken by the defendant. In the circumstances I agree with counsel for the defendant that the plaintiff has no interest in this case. Consequently I allow the defendant’s said application and dismiss this suit with costs including those of this application for want of prosecution. DATED and delivered at Nakuru this 17th day of July, 2008. D. K. MARAGA JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.