REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU Criminal Appeal 120 of 2006 ANDREW EWATON….……………….…………APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC…………………………….………..RESPONDENT JUDGMENT ANDREW EWATON (the Appellant) was with two others charged with three counts of capital robbery. In the alternative the Appellant was alone charged with handling stolen property contrary to Section 322(2) of the Penal code. He was convicted on counts one and two and sentenced to death. He has appealed against both the conviction and sentence. At the hearing on 3rd July 2007, Mr. Mugambi, learned state counsel, conceded the appeal on the ground that the Appellant’s identification was in doubt and that the alleged stolen items that he was found with may very well have been his. Having ourselves read the record we agree that the identification of the Appellant was not proper. The description of the Appellant was not given to the police and the marks the complainant said the Appellant has on his face were not specified. The Appellant maintained that the radio he was found with was his and he pointed to an identifying mark on it. He also said that the shoes he was found with were given to him by the complainant’s son and that was not contested. On these grounds we agree with Mr. Mugambi that the Appellant's conviction is on shaky ground and cannot therefore be allowed to stand. Consequently we allow this appeal, quash the conviction and set aside the sentence. The Appellant shall be set free forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held. DATED and delivered at Nakuru on this 18th day of July, 2008. D. K. MARAGA JUDGE M. MUGO JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.