Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 1649 of 2008

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS) Civil Case 166 of 2008 ISHMAEL KAGUNYI THANDE …………………………. PLAINTIFF VERSUS HOUSING FINANCE CO. LTD. ………………………… DEFENDANT RU LING Notice of motion dated 26/5/08 seeks order to set aside the order made on same day that the plaintiff’s amended chamber summons application dated 13/5/08 be re-instated. The grounds relied upon are set out in the application and in the affidavit of Patrick Kahonge advocate who explains why he failed to reach the court in time on 26/5/2008. It is shown that the advocate had 2 cases in Milimani Commercial Courts, on that day arrived in the building of court at 8.55 a.m. He met N. Mungai one of the advocates, on the opposite side. He also mentions having met Mr. Chacha Odera, Advocate. By the time he reached the court of the Hon. Justice Warsame, at around 9.29 a.m. he found that his application had already been dismissed. The plaintiff himself swears that he was in the court of Hon. Judge when his case was called and he tried to address the Judge informing him that his advocate is on the way. However this was not accepted by the Judge. The duty of the court is to hear disputes between the parties except in the exceptional cases. In this case the reason for non-attendance is explained and it was not deliberate. I accept the explanation given and in exercise of my discretion I allow the application. The orders made of dismissal of application are hereby set aside. The application dated 13/5/08 is hereby re-instated together with interim orders. Costs in the cause. DATED and DELIVERED at Nairobi this 23rd day of September 2008. JOYCE N. KHAMINWA JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.