Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Gatheru Gathemia v The Disciplinary Committee of The Law Society of Kenya

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Misc. Civ. Appli 1332 of 2004 GATHERU GATHEMIA….…..…………………………. PLAINTIFFS VERSUS THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF KENYA…………………… DEFENDANT RULING This is a Notice of Motion dated 20th December, 2007 M/s JOHN MBURU & Company advocates for the applicant GATHERU GATHEMIA. It was brought under Order 53, Rule 4(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules. It seeks for the following orders1. THAT the applicant be granted leave of this Honourable Court to amend the Statutory Statement of facts and the amended Statutory Statement appended hereto be deemed as properly filed and served. 2. THAT the Applicant be granted leave of this Honourable Court to file a further/supplementary affidavit and the supplementary affidavit appended hereto be deemed as properly filed and served. 3. THAT the costs of this Application be costs in the cause. The application was filed with a supporting affidavit sworn by the applicant on 10th December, 2007. The application was not opposed, in the sense that nothing was filed in response to the application. However, Mr. Sagana who appeared at the hearing of the application for the respondent submitted that, in his view, the proposed amendments were not necessary. He did not give any reasons to back his position. These proceedings were brought by the applicant. The applicant has now made the present application, because he want to use some certain information, which was not contained in the documents already filed. In accordance with the provisions of Order 53 rule 4 (2) of the Civil procedure Act, I find no reason why I should not grant the prayers sought. In my view, allowing the application will be in the best interests of justice. Consequently, I allow the application and grant the orders sought. I order that costs will follow the decision in the main motion.

page 1 of 2

Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 23rd day of September, 2008 GEORGE DULU JUDGE. In the presence ofNo appearance for applicant Mr. Mungai holding brief for Mr. Sagana for respondent

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.