REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS) Civil Case 15 of 2003 GEORGE GIKUBU MBUTHIA………..………....PLAINTIFF VERSUS CITY COUNCIL OF NAIROBI..…….................DEFENDANT RULING Notice of motion dated 20.08.2008 by the Plaintiff. This motion was heard exparte because although there is an affidavit of service filed, the Respondent failed to turn up. The prayers sought by the Applicant/Plaintiff are that: 1. The Respondent be ordered to re-open premises known as C.7035, C.1117, C.1217, C.1026 and C.1930 Dandora Phase III, Nairobi. 2. That the Plaintiff give guarantee that it will not evict tenants from the said premises after repair and reinstated new tenants. 3. That the plots C.1217, C.1117, C.1026 and C.1930 be minuted as belonging to the Applicant and consent to issue certificates of tittles be given. The application is based on grounds set out and the affidavit of Applicant. The Applicant states that all the premises aforementioned are lawfully his by virtue of assignments made to him with the consent of the Defendant exhibited as “GGM 1-5.” 4. The Applicant has also exhibited orders made in his favour in High Court Case No. 1874 of 1988 between him and the Defendant including a final decree in that case. Further, the Plaintiff has exhibited “Eviction/Repossession Notices” issued by the Defendant in the year 2000. These notices are addressed to the original assignors of the said plots to the Plaintiff exhibited as “GGM 8” “GGM 8e.” There is no opposition to his application and in view of the contents of the Plaintiffs affidavit and annexures thereto, I allow the application and grant all orders as prayed with costs to the Plaintiff. It is so ordered. DATED this 21st day of October 2008. JOYCE N. KHAMINWA JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.