Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Atkisii v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA ATKISII Criminal Appeal 70 ov 2004 BENARD NYANARO OMAMBIA ……....…………. APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC ……………………………………….. RESPONDENT (From the original conviction and sentence in the Principal Magistrate’s Court at Nyamira Criminal Case No.135 of 2004 by KIARIE W. KIARIE ESQ., P.M.) JUDGMENT The appellant was charged with defilement of a girl under the age of 16 years contrary to section 145(1) of the Penal Code. The particulars of the charge were that on the 21st day of February, 2004 at Nyaramba sub-location in Nyamira District, the appellant had unlawful carnal knowledge of D. K. N; a girl child aged 6 years. He was tried, convicted and sentenced to 25 years’ imprisonment. He appealed against the sentence saying that it was harsh and excessive. Mr. Kemo, Senior Principal State Counsel, opposed the appeal. In his view, the said sentence was justified considering the gravity of the offence. The appellant lured the said child into some nappier grass where he defiled her. When she cried due to the pain which she endured he urged her not to tell her mother, threatening her that her mother would beat her up. The appellant committed a very serious offence whose maximum sentence is imprisonment for life. Considering the gravity of the offence, I see no basis of interfering with the sentence that was handed down by the trial court and dismiss this appeal accordingly. DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at KISII this 29th day of October, 2008. D. MUSINGA JUDGE. Delivered in the open court in the presence of: 1. The Appellant

page 1 of 2

2. Mr. Kemo, Senior Principal State Counsel for the Republic D. MUSINGA JUDGE.

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.