Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Flacia Njoki Muiruri v The Commissioner of Police & 3 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI(NAIROBI LAW COURTS) MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.673 OF 2005 1.JOSEPH MBURU GITAU FELISTA WARIARA NDUKU ISAAC MBURU NJUGUNA 1. KEZIAH WANJA KINOTI 2. CECELIA WANJIRU GICHURU RESPONDENTS 3. GODFREY MUCHANJI AJIAMBO 4. FLACIA NJOKI MUIRURI 5. CHRISTIAN MUCHANJI AJIAMBO 6. MANY WAMBUI KARARI 7. JOSPHAT NJUGUNA MWANGI & 626 OTHERS VERSUS THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE THE COMMISSIONER OF LANDS THE HONOURBLE ATTORNEY GENERAL EX-PARTE 1. JOSEPH MBURU GITAU 2. FELISTA WARIARA NDUKU 3. ISAAC MBURU NJUGUNA 4. KEZIA WANJA KINOTI APPLICNTS

page 1 of 2

5. CECELIA WANJIRU GICHURU 6. GODFREY MUCHANJI AJIAMBO 7. FLACIA NJOKI MUIRURI 8. CHRITIAN MUCHANJI AMIAMBO 9. MARY WAMBUI KARARI 10. JOSPHAT NJUGUNA MWANGI & 626 OTHRS RULING What is before me is an application for leave to commence contempt of court proceedings against three alleged contemnors. The application is dated 4th July, 2008. I have taken into account the submissions of Counsel. What stands out is the issue of service of the orders. A perusal of the affidavit of the process server filed in court on 10 th November, 2005 does not depone to the orders/decree having been personally served on the alleged contemnors. The orders were left with the registry staff in each case. I find that personal service was not effected and for this reason the applicant has to start all over again. I strike down the application dated 4th July 2008 and further order that costs abide the outcome of the main application when determined. DATED and delivered at Nairobi this 19th day of September, 2008. J.G. NYAMU JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.