Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Magutu/gatei/444 and 445 v The Hon. Attorney General & 7 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS 146 OF 2005 IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW AND IN THE MATTER OF THE LETTER BY DISTRICT LAND REGISTRAR NYERI DISTRICT PURPORTING TO CREATE AN ACCESS ROAD ON LAND PARCELS NO. MAGUTU/GATEI/444 AND 445 AND IN THE MATTER OF A GROUP CALLING ITSELF THE GIAKABURI/KANJIKERU SELF HELP GROUP AND IN THE MATTER OF LAND PARCELS NUMBER MAGUTU/GATEI/444 & 445 AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI & PROHIBITION REPUBLIC………………………………………………………………APPLICANT VERSUS THE HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL………………………….1ST RESPONDENT THE DISTRICT LAND REGISTRAR NYERI DISTRICT....2ND RESPONDENT JOSEPH KIHARA GITUI……………………………….…….3RD RESPONDENT MOSES KINAICHU MUGENYO………………………...……4TH RESPONDENT KIMOTHO HIUHU………………………………………….…..5TH RESPONDENT KINYUA HIUHU…………………………………………..…….6TH RESPONDENT WANJWENI KANGERI…………………………………...…..7TH RESPONDENT

page 1 of 2

GIAKABURI/KANJIKERU SELF HELP GROUP…………..8TH RESPONDENT RULING Application dated 1/8/2006 seeks 6 orders. The first for consolidation of this suit and another High Court No.96 of 2005 both suits are said to be between same parties and that subject matter is the same. These proceedings are state proceedings and the procedure applicable is that set out under Order 53 Civil Procedure Rules. There is no room for consolidation in these proceedings. However I order that the first in time be heard first while the second is stayed in the meantime. It is therefore ordered that this suit No. Civil Misc. 146 of 2005 be stayed while Misc. 96 of 2005 do proceed to hearing and determination. This order covers prayer 1, 4, & 6 on prayer 2, 3. I have perused the application and supporting affidavit. I do not find the acts of contempt complained of proved and in view of the Replying Affidavit of the alleged contemnors I am not satisfied that breach of court order is proved. I therefore do not allow the application in respect of prayers on contempt. The same are dismissed with costs to the Respondents. It is so ordered. Dated this 13th November, 2007. J. N. KHAMINWA JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.